Planning Commission Meeting - 11/7/2017
Loading Video . . .
-
Roll Call
-
Approval of the Minutes
-
Selection of Chair and Vice Chair
Planning Commission and Staff Discussion 1
-
2018 Planning Commission Meeting Calendar Acceptance
Planning Commission and Staff Discussion 2
-
Discussion and Briefing
-
SP14-001. EA14-004. APN(S): 299-100-47 and 299-100-48. Applicant/Owner: Watermark DM, L.P. Project Location: Two vacant properties located at the southeast corner of Jimmy Durante Boulevard and San Dieguito Drive. Zone: North Commercial (NC). Overlay Zones: Bluff, Slope and Canyon; Floodplain; Lagoon. Environmental Status: A Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Draft EIR will be distributed for a 45-day public review period currently planned to commence on September 29, 2017 and end November 13, 2017 (SCH#2015051067). Staff Contact: Matt Bator, AICP, Senior Planner. Description: Preliminary review of draft specific plan options and the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Watermark Multi-Family Residential development project located at the southeast corner of Jimmy Durante Boulevard and San Dieguito Drive. The Planning Commission will review the environmental document, receive public comment regarding the Draft EIR’s completeness and the adequacy of the information presented within the Draft EIR, and provide preliminary feedback regarding the specific plan documents.
Continued Applications 1
-
I17-002. Project Applicant: City of Del Mar. Applicable Zones: R1-5B, R1-10B, PP and RM-West. Applicable Overlay Zone: Beach Overlay. Environmental Status: Not subject to CEQA pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. Staff Contact: Evan Langan, AICP, Associate Planner. Description: Interpretation of definitions cited within Chapters 23.20.030 and 30.04 of the Del Mar Municipal Code to clarify: 1) whether the sandy beach west of the delineated line of the Shoreline Protection Area (SPA) should be considered as publicright-of-way; 2) whether the area of the SPA should deducted from the “gross” area of a lot and; 3) whether the area of the SPA should be included in calculations of allowable potential floor area ratio (FAR).
New Applications 2
-
Adjournment